The ULS Report TM
Helping people Use Less Stuff by
conserving resources and reducing waste.
Volume7, Number 1
Sustainability: New Concept, New Century
Big Changes Brewing EPA Gets
Serious About ULS
ULS electronic subscriptions and PDF version
A Business Concept for a New Century
We've been using the term sustainability quite a bit lately. The bad
news is that while experts are not really sure what it means or how to measure it, they
are sure that they'll know it when they see it. The good news is that the business world
isn't waiting for an agreed-upon definition before deciding if it's the right thing to do.
None other than Dow Jones, the venerable publisher of
The Wall Street Journal and namesake of the famous stock market index, has begun tracking
companies based upon an assessment of their level of sustainable activity. Under the name
The Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index (DJSGI), the measure is the "first
systematic methodology for identifying leading sustainability-driven companies
According to the DJSGI Web site, sustainability-driven companies
achieve their business goals through the integration of economic, environmental and social
growth opportunities into their business strategies. By managing all three (commonly known
as "the triple bottom line"), firms should be in a better and more profitable
position to compete in the future. There is a mounting body of evidence that suggests this
Superior performance of sustainability-driven companies relates
directly to their commitment to five principles
1. Technology -- The creation, production and delivery of products
and services should be based upon innovative technology that uses resources effectively
2. Governance -- Sustainability should be based upon the highest
standards of corporate governance.
3. Shareholders -- Shareholder demands should be met with sound
financial returns and productivity increases as well as with increased competitiveness and
contributions to intellectual capital.
4. Industry -- Sustainability companies lead their industry's shift
towards sustainability by demonstrating commitment and publicizing superior performance.
5. Society -- Companies should encourage long term social well being
through their responses to social change, changing demographics and the need for
The DJSGI is set up to include a number of business sectors. Certain
sectors can be excluded as well for obvious reasons, such as tobacco, alcohol and
gambling. Also, the index can be broken out by geographic region (e.g., USA, Europe) or
aggregated for the entire global economy.
While not all companies that comprise the index are publicly
available, we thought you might like to get a look at a few of the ones that are listed on
the Web site:
These companies have met the DJSGI criteria for
sustainability. Other companies that have purportedly made the list include Dow Chemical,
DuPont and Henckel.
It's interesting to note that Dow Jones does not make it easy for
you to find out about the DJSGI. Going to their Web site at www.dowjones.com gives you not indication. To learn
more, try this address: indexes.dowjones.com/djsgi.
What does all of this mean for you, the typical consumer? First, you
can track how well sustainability-driven companies perform versus the rest of the market.
Second, you can make investment decisions that reflect your environmental and social
concerns. And finally, you can make purchase decisions that let manufacturers know you
favor their business approach, thus rewarding them for sustainable policies. In the long
run, the latter will also help get the laggards on the bandwagon. Otherwise, they run the
risk of falling off for good.
Return to Index
Big Changes Brewing for Beer
It's Saturday afternoon and you're out of beer. You
run to the nearest store and grab a six-pack of your favorite brew. Hmmm... The carton
feels somehow lighter. And the bottles thud, rather than clink, when you place them on the
seat. When you get home and open one, the bottle isn't very cold to the touch, but the
beer inside is nicely chilled. What's going on here?
You've just had your first beer packaged in plastic, rather than
glass, bottles. Plastic bottles may not be in your store yet, but they're definitely
Many brewers, including Miller, Anheuser-Busch and Heineken, are
testing the market for plastic beer bottles. Since glass is recyclable and cheap, why
would they want to switch?
After attending conferences, visiting recyclers, touring production
plants and listening to brewers and bottle manufacturers, we have not received a clear or
consistent answer. Here are some of the many reasons that were shared with us
* Plastic beer bottles are made from PET, the same plastic used in
soft drink bottles. Thus, in theory, they should be easy and profitable to recycle (more
on this later).
* While plastic bottles may cost more than glass, the overall cost
to the wallet and the environment may actually be lower, due to significant savings in
transportation costs. Since PET is much lighter than glass, it takes much less energy to
transport plastic bottles, saving fuel and reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas
* Consumers like plastic bottles, since they're safer (won't break),
lighter and recloseable.
* Sales of beer have been flat lately (pun intended), and brewers
are hoping that new and unique types of packaging will help put the fizz back in their
On the recycling front, there are two issues that beer producers
must address. First, most plastic beer bottles contain what's called a barrier layer,
which is a special type of plastic that keeps carbonation in and oxygen out. (Beer that
loses carbonation through the package becomes flat, while beer that picks up oxygen from
outside the bottle becomes stale.) These barrier layers have the potential to make life
tough for recyclers, since the barrier material has the potential to contaminate the PET,
making it less valuable.
Second, most beer bottles are amber. While this is fine for glass,
recyclers currently have no market for amber plastic. One solution is to make the bottle
clear and the barrier layer amber-colored, but again we're back to the barrier issue.
Fortunately, neither the recyclers nor brewers are sitting on their
hands. Through the Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) and NAPCOR (National Association for PET Container
Resources), brewers and bottle producers can work with recyclers to test the affects of
different bottles on typical recycling operations. The same type of activity is occurring
in Europe, through PETCORE, which represents PET
recyclers across the Continent.
By the way, recycling plastic bottles is a fascinating and fairly
mature process. First, bales of bottles are brought to a recycling facility, where they
are sorted and washed, removing impurities, labels, dirt, etc. Then the bottles are ground
up into flakes, washed again and dried. The flakes are then melted down, run through an
extruder and and filtered again for impurities. The resin is then chopped up into little
pellets, which are the raw materials for new plastic products. Depending upon the end
markets, other steps may be required to enhance the quality or consistency of the reborn
And just where do recycled bottles end up? Markets include fiber for
clothing and carpets, plastic sheeting, industrial strapping and new bottles. According to
some industry experts, there is currently more demand for recycled PET than there is
available supply. Thus, a move to plastic beer bottles may in fact help keep recyclers'
facitilities humming, since this additional source of material could provide a profitable
way for them to fill the gap.
Will you be seeing plastic beer bottles anytime soon? Maybe.
Companies have different strategies for introducing them. Miller, for example, will be
selling beer in plastic bottles in what it calls venues -- sports stadiums, arenas, etc.
The reason is that there is a big advantage to the plastic bottle over either the glass
bottle or open cup. Versus glass, the plastic bottle won't break and is lighter, making it
easier for vendors to carry. Versus cups, bottles keep the beer cold, prevent spilling and
Other beer producers may try different approaches. It looks as if
Heineken will try plastic bottles for larger sizes, such as 1 liter bottles. This allows
drinkers to have a glass, reclose the bottle and put it back in the fridge for later.
Regardless of which brewer does what with plastic bottles, one
thing's for sure The beer industry can't afford to ignore the recycling industry. Brewers
will have to ensure that their packaging is compatible with the existing recycling
You have an important part to play, too. Please make sure that if
you obtain beer in plastic bottles, you recycle the bottles. PET can be a profitable and
important part of the recycling process, but only if you put in the small amount of time
and effort it takes to participate. Cheers!
Return to Index
The EPA Gets Serious About Waste Prevention
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently released its
National Source Reduction Characterization Report (EPA530-R-00-034, November 1999), the
first comprehensive analysis of source reduction at the national level. There's lots of
information contained in the report, and we're very happy to see that the EPA is
confirming what we've been saying all along source reduction (using less stuff) is a
powerful and increasingly important way to reduce trash, pollution, organic waste and the
use of hazardous materials.
The principal finding in the report is that in 1996, Americans
reduced municipal solid waste (MSW) by over 23 million tons. This is equivalent to 11% of
the 210 million tons of waste that were generated in that year. Significantly, source
reduction has been growing by leaps and bounds, as shown below
Here are the functional areas used to measure waste prevention and
their impacts on the total amount reduced
1996 Source Reduction By Material Categories
(000 Tons Reduced)
Containers & Packaging
Organics & Miscellaneous
Durable Goods -- The reduction here relates primarily to
the growth of electronics reuse markets as well as weight and size reductions for items
like computers and telephones.
Nondurable Goods -- The primary driver here was source
reduction of newspapers, either by reducing the amount of paper used per page or the total
number of pages produced.
Containers & Packaging -- The reduction in this area
was due to two different factors. First, waste from wood pallets was significantly
reduced, thanks to greater reuse of pallets as well as a trend toward thinner, lighter
slipsheets. Second, much packaging weight was eliminated as manufacturers continued
switching from glass to plastic or aluminum. This trend was most striking in the soft
drink industry. For example, between 1980 and 1996, beverage consumption increased by 63%,
yet packaging waste declined by 20%!
Organics & Miscellaneous -- The biggest overall
reduction was in yard trimmings, as communities began banning them from landfills,
composting facilities came on line, and individuals began the switch to mulching mowers.
Not all areas showed reductions, however. Clothing and footwear
showed an expansion of almost 800,000 tons, commercial printing grew by 1.5 million tons,
and paper boxes increased by almost 2.2 million tons. It is hoped that use of the Internet
for business-to-business applications will slow the growth of commercial printing.
However, paper boxes (corrugated) continue to expand as electronic commerce increases and
more packages are shipped, rather than driven, home. The corrugated industry is working
hard to reduce the weight of their materials, but demand is simply outpacing their
abilities to do so.
Here are a number of interesting case histories outlining ways in
which companies large and small have saved financial and natural resources by
lightweighting, eliminating, substituting, reusing and recovering
Montgomery County, MD -- Following a 1994 ban on
yard trimming disposal, the county began an aggressive program aimed at grasscycling,
backyard composting and mulching. The result has been a 50% reduction in yard trimming
generation, as well as a $1million reduction in annual composting costs. The county was
also able to avoid the $2.5 million cost of expanding its composting facilities.
Pallet Resource of North Carolina -- This company
collects, repairs and reuses over 1.25 million wooden pallets per year. By diverting this
material from landfills, over 16.25 million board feet of lumber are saved each year,
conserving about 180,000 cubic yards of landfill space.
Clorox Company -- The company switched from glass
to plastic bottles for its barbecue sauces and salad dressings. This eliminated nearly
15,000 tons of waste annually. The reduced weight of the product also meant that shipping
containers could be made lighter, eliminating the annual need for some 1,000 tons of
Procter & Gamble -- By redesigning plastic
bottles used for vegetable oils, P&G cut their use of plastic by 1,250 tons . Like
Clorox above, the lighter bottles meant that lighter cartons could be used, further saving
650 tons of corrugated annually.
Coca-Cola Company -- Simply by shaving the diameter
of the neck of its aluminum cans, Coke has reduced aluminum usage annually by an estimated
New York State Dept. of Correctional Services (DOCS)
-- Survey data found that 30% of the DOCS waste stream was food scraps. To reduce disposal
costs and comply with state waste reduction legislation, a composting program was
initiated at 47 facilities. The result was an annual reduction in organic waste by almost
7,000 tons, representing a 90% recovery rate. Annual savings in avoided disposal costs
Federal Express -- Since 1981, Federal Express has
continuously reduced the thickness of the paperboard used to manufacture its 9-1/2"
by 12-1/2" FedEx Letter envelope.The envelope has been lightweighted by 40%, and the
combined savings from this source reduction activity and the redesign of other paper,
paperboard, and polyethylene shipping containers totals more than $20 million annually for
Target Stores -- This chain of over 850 retail
stores eliminates about 2,250 tons of waste per year (the majority of which is low-density
polyethylene) and saved an estimated $4.5 million by initiating a packaging reduction
program for its "softlines" merchandise, which includes items like clothing and
shoes. In addition, its suppliers saved an estimated $3 million by reducing the packaging
material used in shipments.
Herman Miller -- This furniture manufacturer has
implemented a variety of returnable and reusable packaging systems with their suppliers.
In 1990, Herman Millers Holland Chair Plant underwent a six month switch over from a
waste-intensive corrugated box and filler system for shipping shells for its Equa chairs
to a reusable plastic tray system. The company has saved at least $1.4 million since the
packaging change. The change itself resulted in a 70% packaging material reduction and a
94% decrease in damage claims.
3M -- This manufacturing company prepares thousands
of meals daily at its headquarters. Disposal of food waste was a costly endeavor. A
consultant helped 3M locate a farming operation experienced in collecting and converting
reclaimed food to animal feed. In the programs first 2 years, 3M diverted 45 tons of
food scraps and edible oils and saved more than $30,000.
Return to Index
The ULS Report is a quarterly publication of Partners for Environmental
Progress. Send e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Snail mail address: P.O. Box 130116, Ann Arbor, MI 48113
Editor: Robert Lilienfeld
Technical Advisor: Dr. William Rathje
Electronic versions of The ULS Report are free. We do accept
contributions of up to $6.00 to help cover the costs of production and distribution.
We encourage you to reuse and recycle our information. Since The ULS Report, Use
Less Stuff, Reduction Roundup and the ULS logo are trademarks of Partners for
Environmental Progress, please contact us prior to reprinting.
Copyright 2000 Partners for
Environmental Progress. All rights reserved.
To return to the top of this report, click here.
You can browse ULS back
issues or go to our Web home page.